> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://lurkai.mintlify.site/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Lurk Score

## What Lurk Scores are

Lurk Scores are a scoring layer built on top of Track Records.

While Track Records show the underlying history, Lurk Scores turn that history into a faster credibility signal.

The goal is to help users quickly understand whether a trader, strategy, source, or signal history appears reliable based on documented performance.

## How Lurk Scores relate to Track Records

Track Records are the evidence.

Lurk Scores are the summary.

A Track Record may show:

* past calls
* resolved outcomes
* win/loss history
* market categories
* confidence levels
* timestamps
* notes
* performance over time

A Lurk Score takes that history and creates a cleaner high-level signal that is easier to compare.

A Lurk Score should never replace the Track Record. It should point users toward it.

## What Lurk Scores are for

Use Lurk Scores when you want to:

* quickly compare credibility
* identify stronger signal sources
* filter noisy users or strategies
* review performance at a glance
* decide whether a Track Record deserves deeper review
* understand whether someone has been consistently useful over time

Lurk Scores are designed to save time, not make decisions automatically.

## What may affect a Lurk Score

A Lurk Score may consider factors like:

* accuracy
* consistency
* sample size
* recency
* specificity of calls
* category performance
* confidence calibration
* resolved versus unresolved entries
* quality of documented reasoning
* performance across different market types

The score should reward useful, specific, and historically grounded signal.

It should not reward volume alone.

## Why sample size matters

A small Track Record can look impressive without proving much.

Someone who gets 2 out of 2 calls right may have a perfect record, but not enough history to prove consistency.

Lurk Scores should account for this by weighing larger, cleaner records more heavily than tiny records with limited evidence.

## Why recency matters

Markets change.

A user or strategy that performed well a year ago may not be as useful today.

Lurk Scores may weigh recent performance more strongly while still preserving long-term history inside the full Track Record.

## Why category matters

A person may be strong in one area and weak in another.

For example, someone may perform well in:

* politics
* sports
* crypto
* macro
* entertainment
* breaking news markets

But that does not mean their signal quality transfers across every category.

A good Lurk Score should help users understand general credibility while still allowing category-specific review.

## What a Lurk Score is not

A Lurk Score is not:

* a guarantee of future performance
* a trading recommendation
* proof that someone is always right
* a replacement for reviewing the underlying record
* a measure of popularity alone
* a reward for posting constantly

A high score means the available record appears stronger based on Lurk’s scoring logic.

It does not mean the next call will be right.

## Using Lurk Scores

A typical workflow:

1. Find a trader, source, strategy, or signal.
2. Check the Lurk Score for a quick credibility read.
3. Open the full Track Record.
4. Review the underlying calls and outcomes.
5. Check sample size, category, and recency.
6. Decide whether the signal deserves attention.

## Best practices

Use Lurk Scores as a filter, not a final answer.

Before trusting a score, check:

* how many entries support it
* whether the record includes losses
* how recent the performance is
* which market categories it applies to
* whether the person makes specific calls
* whether the score is based on resolved outcomes

A score with strong supporting history is more useful than a score built on limited activity.

## Common issues

### “Why does someone with a high win rate have a lower Lurk Score?”

Their sample size may be small, their calls may be vague, or their performance may not be recent enough.

Win rate is only one part of credibility.

### “Why does someone with losses still have a strong Lurk Score?”

Losses are normal.

A strong record can include losses if the overall history shows useful judgment, good calibration, clear reasoning, and consistent performance.

### “Why did a Lurk Score change?”

Scores may update as:

* markets resolve
* new calls are added
* old calls become less recent
* entries are corrected
* additional performance data becomes available

### “Can a Lurk Score be wrong?”

Yes.

A Lurk Score is a tool for summarizing evidence. It depends on available data, scoring logic, and the quality of the underlying Track Record.

Always review the full record when the decision matters.

## Important note

Lurk Scores are credibility signals.

They help users evaluate documented history faster, but they do not guarantee future results or replace independent judgment. Use them as a starting point for deeper review.
